Connect with us

Laws & Rights

What Do America’s Anti-Gun Mayors Have in Common?

Published

on

Besides terrible fashion sense, that is? (Image courtesy NSSF. Disrespectful caption courtesy Mo Rockwell.)

Hey, remember Mike Bloomberg’s “Mayors Against Illegal Guns”?

If you don’t remember “MAIG,” you can certainly be forgiven; after all, it was founded by Mike Bloomberg, whose triple claims to fame include banning 20-oz. sodas, failing at elections, and loving Dick’s. Back in the early ’00s, Bloomie first tried his hand at imposing New York City-style gun control on the rest of America by founding an organization called Mayors Against Illegal Guns. The trouble with MAIG was that it was every bit as popular as Bloomberg himself … by which we mean that he simply added mayors’ names to the organization without their permission. After having this faux pas make the news (well, at least the news outlets that he doesn’t own) Mayors Against Illegal Guns was quietly folded into Bloomberg’s next try at an anti-gun club, Everytown.

America’s anti-gun mayors just sent a rather interesting list of demands to the Senate. Bloomie’s name isn’t on it because he isn’t a mayor anymore, but chances are quite good that he bankrolled everything from the pencil to the podium. The names that are on it have some interesting things in common. First, they represent cities where every citizen who can leave is doing so. Second, they overwhelmingly have a “D” after their names. Third, no matter how much they share with him ideologically and how willing they are to accept his money, none of them want their picture taken with Mike Bloomberg. SAD!

For a more thorough (and somewhat more polite) analysis, we’re turning it over to the inimitable Larry Keane of the NSSF!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MAYORS ON GUN CONTROL LETTER HAVE ONE BIG THING IN COMMON


By Larry Keane

Dozens of mayors from America’s biggest cities are demanding the U.S. Senate pass more gun control.

“We write to urge the Senate to pass during the lame duck session gun safety legislation that has passed the House…,” the mayors’ letter states.

An answer to the crime problem plaguing these cities might not be found in Congress. Rather the mayors should look closer to home for solutions. Or better yet, take a good long look in the mirror.

 The First Demand

The letter was sent by The United States Conference of Mayors and was signed by 74 mayors. They made two demands of U.S. Sens. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). First, they want the Senate to pass S. 736, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2022, which would ban an entire class of firearms – Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs) — that are commonly-owned and commonly-used. Industry data estimates there are more than 24.4 million in circulation since 1990, with ownership exploding in recent years.

Enacting the ban on MSRs, or the semiautomatic centerfire rifles the mayors misleadingly deem “assault weapons,” would not “in any way infringe on Second Amendment rights,” the mayors suggest. They claim two-thirds of Americans support banning MSRs but The Reload reported that’s flat false – revealing less than 50 percent of Americans support such a ban. That’s likely because more law-abiding Americans than ever before – including women and minorities – have purchased MSRs to use for self-defense, recreational shooting and hunting. In any event, Constitutional rights are not decided by a popularity contest.

The FBI’s Uniform Crime Report shows more murders were committed by individuals using knives, fists and clubs than by those using any rifle – not just MSRs like AR-15s. The Senate bill would likely not even receive 50 votes, let alone the 60 votes required, as Sens. John Tester (D-Mont.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) have repeatedly voiced opposition.

The Second Demand

The letter’s second demand is for the Senate to pass a bill enacting a universal background check system to track all firearm transfers, including private ones. The mayors say this is “closing loopholes” and stopping buyers from “circumventing the law.” Those two phrases are oxymorons as the law is the law as written – it’s not loopholes or circumvention.

The legislation, S. 529, The Background Check Expansion Act, has severe legal problems as its implementation requires a national firearm registry. That’s specifically prohibited under the 1986 Gun Control Act and the 1993 Brady Act. It is unlawful because history teaches us that registration is a necessary precursor to confiscation by the government.

The legislation would also, “aid law enforcement’s ability to trace crime guns.” They want to repeal the Tiahrt Amendment which restricts public access to sensitive, law enforcement-only firearm tracing data. This restriction is supported by Congress, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and law enforcement groups such as the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) because it secures sensitive tracing information which would jeopardize ongoing criminal investigations and put the lives of law enforcement officers, cooperating retailers and witnesses at risk. They also fail to mention that their own law enforcement agencies have access to trace data for their cities, that they can share data with other agencies and that ATF has joint task forces and regularly shares intelligence with state and local law enforcement often derived from examining trace data.

Who Signed?

The signers are a who’s who of gun control supporters, with one glaring similarity. Democrats make up 92 percent, or 68 of the 74 letter co-signers. The mayors of several of the Top 10 cities which had the most Americans fleeing them in recent years signed, including San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Boston, Seattle, Chicago and Detroit. Surging crime and soft-on-criminal policies have been a significant issue in those cities.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams signed. He ran his campaign on getting tough on criminals but has instead deflected action and pushed for national gun control.

Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler signed the letter. His city descended into chaos and saw a federal courthouse set on fire by rioters. Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell signed too. Criminals in Seattle under previous mayor Jenny Durkan set up a “Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone,” or CHAZ, where law enforcement was prohibited. That’s where “Raz the Warlord” was captured on video handing out AR-15s from his Tesla’s trunk, violating several of Seattle’s existing gun laws.

Chicago’s Lori Lightfoot has been too busy making dance music videos to address the surging crime problem plaguing the Windy City and San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo already passed gun ownership restrictions on residents even though he admitted to CNN his plans won’t address the crime problem. “Skeptics will say that criminals won’t comply. They’re right,” he said.

Several of the mayors who signed the gun control letter come from Red states where voters have approved Constitutional carry laws in the past years and expanded the ability of law-abiding Americans to purchase legal firearms, including MSRs, for self-defense.

What the mayors refuse to accept is that criminals don’t follow their laws. They should focus their efforts closer to home and hold criminals accountable instead of running to Washington, D.C., and passing the buck.

11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. John

    December 29, 2022 at 9:26 am

    If you want to see organized crime in action, just go to Washington D.C.

  2. Davud

    December 21, 2022 at 1:40 am

    They all are in it for the money. NAME just one career pilitician in the last 70 years, that didn’t become a millioniar?

    • Clark Kent

      December 29, 2022 at 8:06 pm

      You mean millionliar?

  3. Bret

    December 20, 2022 at 8:42 am

    A law should be passed that automatically allows punishment if convicted of any individual who initiates or votes for any bill that is anti constitutional.

  4. David Folsom

    December 20, 2022 at 8:35 am

    Coddle criminals and punish law-abiding citizens. Most of us learned, either by raising kids or training dogs, that we get more of the behavior we reward, and less of the behavior we discourage. These mayors and the voters who elected them will continue to see an increase in the number of criminals and a decrease in the number of decent people living in their cities.

  5. Alan

    December 19, 2022 at 4:27 pm

    How is it that these Anti Civil Rights/Anti Constitutional Rights types obtain and maintain elective office? Is the electorate really that unthinking?

    • Clark Kent

      December 29, 2022 at 8:08 pm

      ‘No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public’ – H.L. Mencken.

  6. DIYinSTL

    December 19, 2022 at 3:06 pm

    MAIG is in itself an oxymoron. There is no such thing as an “illegal gun” though there are thousands of “illegally possessed guns.” By that I am conceding that a convicted violent criminal may by law be prevented from legally possessing a firearm.

  7. Dennis Sumner

    December 19, 2022 at 1:13 pm

    They resent the fact that their constituents are doing what the cops that they defunded and handcuffed used to do!!

  8. Jeff T.

    December 19, 2022 at 1:02 pm

    Apparently, none of these mayors can even read and understand the SCOTUS decision on Bruen. Whatever they pass locally will be struck down by their state (if preemption law is in place), or by the SCOTUS. They cannot ignore the US Constitution.

    • Davud

      December 21, 2022 at 1:05 am

      They all are in it for the money. NAME just one career pilitician in the last 70 years, that didn’t become a millioniar?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Copyright © 2021 Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. Guns & Gadgets Daily is a wholly owned subsidiary of Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.