Gun Rights
Why the New Gun Control Bill Sucks Like a Collapsing Star
Well, here’s another one for the Supreme Court to strike down …
Thursday, June 23 was the best of times; it was the worst of times. It was the age of wisdom, and it was the age of foolishness. On the one hand, the Supreme Court was finally able to rule that the plain text of the Second Amendment means what it says, and says what it means. On the other hand, the U.S. Senate, complete with several Republican quislings who decided to vote against gun rights, passed a bill that’s unconstitutional on its face. Sooner or later, the Supreme Court will have to strike it down … but that’s likely to take a few years. Here’s NRA’s Institute of Legislative Action to explain why this bill sucks like a collapsing star.
________________________________________________
On Thursday, the U.S Senate passed a sweeping package of gun control measures. The text of the legislation was only unveiled Tuesday evening. And while much of the 80-page bill did indeed seek to address underlying issues with our nation’s mental health system and funding for improved school security, the legislation contains a sweeping set of gun control measures. It is because of these gun control measures that NRA is opposing the package.
The package includes three main gun control provisions:
Unconstitutional Red Flag Laws
The gun control package would allow states to use federal taxpayer dollars to implement state-level gun confiscation orders, i.e. “red flag” laws. The legislation provides insufficient safeguards to prevent states with the lowest standards of procedure from qualifying for the funding, including those that currently have “red flag” laws allowing ex parte confiscation orders. Under such orders, lawfully-owned firearms could be seized before the accused had so much as an opportunity to contest the accusations against them. (Additional background on “red flag” laws can be found here and here).
Discretionary Waiting Periods for Law-Abiding Adults
The legislation would also create unnecessary, ineffective and arbitrary waiting periods for certain law-abiding adults who are not prohibited from purchasing firearms. The text would give anti-gun Attorney General Merrick Garland the discretion to delay firearm sales for mere “cause,” in order to do a secondary background check on juvenile records. Nothing in the legislation prevents DOJ and FBI from finding “cause” to delay all such purchases, with the practical effect of becoming a waiting period, with only the possibility, not a guarantee, the nonprohibited purchaser will be able to receive the gun.
NICS Expansion for Misdemeanors
Additionally, the gun control package would significantly increase the number of Americans who are federally barred from possessing firearms by expanding prohibitions for non-domestic, non-violent misdemeanor convictions. Virtually no other constitutional right is taken away for misdemeanor convictions and this legislation would treat the Second Amendment as a second-class right. (Additional background here).
The bill was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, June 24, and is on its way to President Biden’s desk for signature. You can support NRA-ILA in its legislative efforts (without buying Wayne LaPierre a private jet) here.
-
By Interest3 weeks ago
Yippee-Ki-Yay! It’s the Christmas Movie $18.5K Guns & Gear Giveaway
-
By Interest2 months ago
Democrats Hate Gun Safety, Part Eleventy: Kunce’s Hilarious Gun Safety FAIL
-
Guns & Ammo2 months ago
Honest Review: KFI Impala Plus Shotgun
-
Laws & Rights4 weeks ago
New Post-Election Game: Where’s Walz-o?
-
Laws & Rights4 days ago
Wisconsin School Shooting Proves Nobody’s Home in the Oval Office
-
By Interest2 weeks ago
How Our “Yippee Ki Yay” H&K Makes it Christmas Every Day
-
Laws & Rights1 month ago
Black Guns & 30-Round Banana Mags Are the New “Taste of Chicago”
-
Laws & Rights1 month ago
Go On, Squeal: Anti-Gunners’ Purty Mouths Vs. National CCW Reciprocity