Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stevens Calls For Repeal Of 2nd Amendment
Former United States Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is calling for a repeal of the 2nd Amendment of the Consititution in a New York Times Op-Ed published today. Referring to the March For Our Lives protest this past weekend,
demonstrators should seek more effective and more lasting reform. They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.
Stevens’ primary argument is that states (and, in effect, we as citizens) have no need to defend ourselves against the US Federal Government.
Concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the separate states led to the adoption of that amendment, which provides that “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Today that concern is a relic of the 18th century.
For one thing, he seems to be conveniently forgetting recent history. It doesn’t take much thought to recall the events surrounding Cliven Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Ryan Payne, Joseph O’Shaughnessy and others out in Nevada and Oregon to remind us that, indeed, a “national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the separate states.”
Justice Stevens has also not seemed to have come to terms with the landmark Supreme Court ruling of 2008 –
In 2008, the Supreme Court overturned Chief Justice Burger’s and others’ long-settled understanding of the Second Amendment’s limited reach by ruling, in District of Columbia v. Heller, that there was an individual right to bear arms. I was among the four dissenters.
That decision — which I remain convinced was wrong and certainly was debatable — has provided the N.R.A. with a propaganda weapon of immense power.
Notice here that he takes aim at the N.R.A. and their fierce defense of the 2nd Amendment –
Overturning that decision via a constitutional amendment to get rid of the Second Amendment would be simple and would do more to weaken the N.R.A.’s ability to stymie legislative debate and block constructive gun control legislation than any other available option.
Having to deal with political and idealogical opposition such as this, it’s no wonder the N.R.A. has developed such a powerful voice in our country –
“The N.R.A. will not only speak out,” he said, “we will speak out louder and we will speak out stronger than ever before.”
And that’s to say nothing of the history of gun control and its affect on our nation’s minority groups –
For more on the history of gun rights here in the U.S., see this FAQ page from the Second Amendment Foundation.
Gun Rights1 month ago
Wow! NBC Reporter’s On-Air Gun Felony May Actually Be Prosecuted
Laws & Rights2 weeks ago
ALOHA, BRAH! Hawaii’s Insane Gun Laws Finally in the Crosshair
Ammo2 months ago
You’re Saying It Wrong! Four Frequent Firearm Foul-Ups
Laws & Rights2 months ago
2A Report Card: Biden’s SCOTUS Pick, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson
Laws & Rights1 month ago
Sacramento Massacre: Blame Revolving-Door Prisons, Not Guns
Laws & Rights2 months ago
BREAKING: Half of America Now Allows Constitutional Carry
By Interest5 days ago
How They Make the World’s Biggest Revolver
By Type2 weeks ago
Di Di Mau: M1 Carbine For When Things Go Dinky-Dau