22 ARC Ballistics: Every Load We Found, With Sources

This 22 ARC ballistics page carries every 22 ARC factory load we could find, as published by its maker, with the source for each figure so the numbers can be checked.

Every 22 ARC factory load we retrieved, with the test barrel, zero and sight height its figures actually belong to.

Key numbers
Factory loads retrieved
5 from 1 maker
Loads with a published table
5
Loads with a published coefficient
5
Supersonic / subsonic
5 / 0
Stated test barrels
24 in (5 loads)
Worst table reproduction error
0.5 fps
Read this before you use these numbers. Every figure here is the ammunition maker’s own published data, or arithmetic on it that we show our working for. Published tables are computed for a test barrel, a sight height and an atmosphere that the maker may or may not state — and where a figure is read rather than quoted, this page says so. Your rifle, your scope height, your altitude and your temperature will differ. Nothing here is a substitute for confirming zero and drop on a range with the ammunition you will actually shoot. Guns and Gadgets Daily is not affiliated with any manufacturer named on this page, and all product and company names are the marks of their respective owners.

What is not on this page. These are velocity, energy and trajectory tables and nothing else. There is no recoil data and no terminal-performance data here — nothing on this page tells you whether a load will do its job on an animal at any distance. There is no wind-drift data here either. This page covers the factory loads we retrieved from Hornady. Other makers load this cartridge; a load missing from the table means we did not retrieve it, not that it does not exist.

22 ARC ballistics: every factory load we retrieved

5 factory 22 ARC loads were retrieved from Hornady. All of them are published on the same 24 in test barrel, so their velocities are directly comparable with each other.

Line chart of 22 ARC published muzzle velocity in feet per second out to 500 yards for all five Hornady factory loads, from the 62 grain ELD-VT to the 88 grain ELD Match
All five Hornady loads on one scale. The 70 grain leaves second fastest and arrives slowest of the five at 500 yards; the 88 grain starts 480 fps behind the 62 grain and closes to within 110.
Every 22 ARC factory load retrieved, with its barrel, zero and sight height
LoadWeightPublished G1 BCTest barrelZeroSight heightMuzzle (fps)Muzzle (ft-lb)200 yd (fps)200 yd (ft-lb)100 yd path300 yd pathFull published velocity row (fps)88 gr ELD MatchHornady8154388 gr0.54524 in200 yd1.5 in2,8201,5542,4911,212+1.7 in-7.3 in0–500 yd in 100-yd steps: 2,820 / 2,652 / 2,491 / 2,335 / 2,185 / 2,04080 gr ELD‑X Precision HunterHornady8154480 gr0.48524 in100 yd1.5 in3,0101,6092,6261,225+0.0 in-10.9 in0–500 yd in 100-yd steps: 3,010 / 2,814 / 2,626 / 2,447 / 2,274 / 2,10875 gr ELD Match BlackHornady8154175 gr0.46724 in200 yd1.5 in3,0751,5752,6721,189+1.4 in-6.2 in0–500 yd in 100-yd steps: 3,075 / 2,868 / 2,672 / 2,483 / 2,302 / 2,12970 gr CX SuperformanceHornady8153970 gr0.39224 in200 yd1.5 in3,1251,5182,6431,086+1.4 in-6.3 in0–500 yd in 100-yd steps: 3,125 / 2,877 / 2,643 / 2,421 / 2,209 / 2,00862 gr ELD‑VT V‑MatchHornady8154262 gr0.39524 in200 yd1.5 in3,3001,4992,8031,081+1.1 in-5.6 in0–500 yd in 100-yd steps: 3,300 / 3,044 / 2,803 / 2,574 / 2,357 / 2,150MakerSymbol
Published G1 ballistic coefficient (BC) is the drag number the maker prints for that load, measured against the standard G1 bullet shape. Higher sheds speed more slowly, so it drops less over the same distance. Not a measure of power. What a G1 coefficient is.

Where the zero column comes from. For the other 5 loads the zero is not labelled in the source we retrieved and is read off the published path — it is the distance at which that path crosses zero.

Taking only the loads that share a full basis — supersonic, a 24-inch test barrel, a 200-yard zero and a 1.5-inch sight height, which is 4 of the 5 supersonic loads here — the published 300-yard path runs between 5.6 and 7.3 inches below the line of sight.

How far the published tables and the published coefficients agree

Of the 5 22 ARC loads here that publish both a coefficient and a velocity table, all 5 were checked by recovering the coefficient the table implies and comparing it with the one printed on the box. All 5 reproduce the maker’s own velocity row to within 0.6 fps at every printed distance.

For 5 of those 5 the recovered coefficient lands 1.9% to 2.0% above the printed one, across the 5 Hornady loads here. Every load here is Hornady, so this page on its own cannot separate a Hornady modeling convention from an industry-wide one; the same offset appears across other makers on our other cartridge pages.

This offset is not a measurement of the air. Density and coefficient enter the drag only as a ratio, so a velocity table pins the ratio and nothing else. Tested, not assumed: it holds on 5 of the 5 loads here. The derivation.

How this 22 ARC ballistics data was worked out

Figures here are the makers’ own. Where this page computes, it integrates a point-mass trajectory on the standard G1 drag function in the ICAO standard atmosphere with no fitted correction. Method, constants and uncertainty budget. Run your own barrel, zero and conditions.

Every coefficient on this page is printed to 3 decimals, so the coarsest carries a rounding of plus or minus 0.0005 before any calculation happens. Propagated through the model across the 5 loads here, that gives an expanded uncertainty of about 2 fps (k = 2) — so treat two velocities within roughly 2 fps of each other as the same number, ours included. Coefficient rounding, not the solver, sets that figure.

Common questions

How much does a 22 ARC drop at 300 yards?

Between 5.6 and 7.3 inches for the 4 22 ARC loads here published on the same 24-inch test barrel, a 200-yard zero and a 1.5-inch sight height. If you are shooting one of these, that range is not your answer: 22 ARC 80 gr ELD‑X Precision Hunter at 10.9 in (100-yard zero, 1.5 in sight height). They are published on a different zero or sight height, so they are listed with their own figures rather than averaged in. These are the maker’s own figures for their test barrel in a standard atmosphere; yours will differ, so confirm your own drop on a range before you rely on any of it.

Which 22 ARC load shoots flattest?

On the one basis these can be compared on — a 24-inch barrel, a 200-yard zero and a 1.5-inch sight height, which 4 of these loads share — it is Hornady 22 ARC 62 gr ELD‑VT V‑Match, 5.6 inches low at 300 yards, against 6.2 in for Hornady 22 ARC 75 gr ELD Match Hornady…. Loads published on a different barrel or a different zero are in the table but not in that ranking.

Do these numbers match my rifle?

Not exactly — every figure here belongs to the maker’s test barrel, not yours. Put your own barrel, zero and conditions in.

Sources

Data updated September 2026.

Every figure on this page was read from the page or interface listed below, and a copy of each source was archived at the moment it was read, with its retrieval time and a checksum, so the page can be audited against what the source actually said on that date.

  1. Hornady, 22 ARC 62 gr ELD‑VT V‑Match — https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/rifle/22-arc-62-gr-eld-vt-v-match
  2. Hornady, 22 ARC 70 gr CX Superformance — https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/rifle/22-arc-70-gr-cx-superformance
  3. Hornady, 22 ARC 75 gr ELD Match Hornady Black — https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/rifle/22-arc-75-gr-eld-match-hornady-black
  4. Hornady, 22 ARC 80 gr ELD‑X Precision Hunter — https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/rifle/22-arc-80-gr-eld-x-precision-hunter
  5. Hornady, 22 ARC 88 gr ELD Match — https://www.hornady.com/ammunition/rifle/22-arc-88-gr-eld-match
  6. JBM Ballistics, standard G1 drag function, 79 points of Mach against drag coefficient — jbmballistics.com/downloads/mcg1.txt

Data updated: 23 August 2026

Get the next reference page when it lands.

New caliber pages, corrections to these tables, and the data releases behind them.

By James “The XDMAN” Nicholas — 07/02 NFA firearms manufacturer, professional gunsmith with over 20 years of experience, firearms writer, photographer and firearms expert. More from James.

Method: how we compute these tables. Found a figure you think is wrong? Tell me, and tell me the source you think is right. It gets fixed on the page with a dated note saying what changed. I do not rewrite silently.